A second particular investigation crew is being fashioned to research the case of theft of choices at Shri Ram Janmabhoomi temple in Ayodhya. In the listening to held on Monday, July 20, the Supreme Court mentioned {that a} SIT needs to be fashioned below the management of a senior IPS officer. A petition was filed earlier than the Supreme Court to get the matter investigated by the CBI. The court docket desires a brand new SIT to research it. Its train began in Lucknow instantly after the Supreme Court’s remark. Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath ordered to kind a second SIT. Now the query is that one SIT has investigated for a month, whose interim report has come and the ultimate report can be prepared, then what will the different SIT examine now?
It is stunning that why the authorities didn’t perceive what the court docket understood so simply? The court docket mentioned that this can be a matter of investigation of a criminal offense. On this foundation, he requested to kind SIT below the management of senior IPS. If the authorities had understood this, it will have already appointed an IPS as the chairman of the SIT. But the authorities made IAS officer Vijay Vishwas Pant the head of the SIT. Keep in thoughts that IAS officers haven’t acquired coaching in crime investigation. Police officers are skilled on this. I do not know why the authorities gave the duty of investigating the crime to an IAS officer. The problem on this matter is that the temple administration, Ayodhya police, SIT have all investigated. Now it’s obscure what the new SIT will discover in the investigation. It is meaningless to count on that now the new SIT will uncover one thing new. No matter how succesful an IPS could also be, he can not do something new after a lot time has handed since the crime and a number of other investigations and inquiries have been carried out.