Nainital. Uttarakhand High Court has stayed the proposed important examination of Uttarakhand Combined State Civil Select Subordinate Services Examination 2025. This examination was to be held on December 6 and 9. This ban has been imposed after listening to the petition filed concerning incorrect questions requested in the preliminary examination.
The case was heard earlier than the division bench of Justice Ravindra Maithani and Justice Alok Mehra. The court docket has directed the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission to launch the revised results of the preliminary examination by eradicating one incorrect query from the General Studies topic. Apart from this, a new benefit listing needs to be issued as per the regulation of the 12 months 2022.
According to the case, Kuldeep Kumar and different candidates had filed a petition in the High Court difficult the questions of the preliminary examination. This examination was carried out for greater than 120 posts together with Deputy Collector, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Finance Officer-Treasury Officer, Assistant Commissioner State Tax, State Tax Officer, Assistant Municipal Commissioner, Executive Officer, Additional Chief Officer District Panchayat, District Social Welfare Officer. Its end result was launched on October 8. In this, about 1200 candidates had been declared profitable for the principle examination.
Jeep filled with passengers fell into deep ditch, 5 died
The petition alleged {that a} query from General Studies in the preliminary examination was incorrectly framed, thereby affecting the end result. On this, the Public Service Commission additionally admitted in the court docket that one query of General Studies was incorrect and may have been eliminated. After the listening to, the High Court quickly stayed the proposed important examination of Uttarakhand Public Service Commission. Now the additional course of shall be determined after the discharge of revised preliminary end result and new benefit listing.
Three different questions and their choices had been additionally declared incorrect by the petitioner. On this, the court docket gave clear directions and mentioned that query quantity 70 needs to be eliminated fully. The remaining three disputed questions needs to be investigated by an knowledgeable committee. The Court additionally mentioned that until a good investigation of those questions is accomplished and the benefit listing is correctly re-determined, it could not be acceptable to conduct the principle examination.